Envisages of New Product Developments in Small and Medium Enterprises through Virtual Team - Munich Personal RePEc Archive

Envisages of New Product Developments in Small and Medium Enterprises through Virtual Team

Ale Ebrahim, Nader and Ahmed, Shamsuddin and Taha, Zahari (2009): Envisages of New Product Developments in Small and Medium Enterprises through Virtual Team. Published in: Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management Dhaka, Bangladesh (9. January 2010): pp. 1-10.

PDF MPRA_paper_26984.pdf Download (561Kb) | Preview

Abstract

New product development (NPD) in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) virtual team has not been systematically investigated in developing countries. Literatures have shown no significant differences between traditional NPD and virtual NPD in general. New product development especially for SMEs virtual team are somewhat lacking in the literature and constitute a research gap. This paper aims to bridge this gap. This study first reviews the NPD and its relationship with virtuality and then identifies the critical factors in definition of NPD in SMEs virtual team. The statistical method was utilized to perform the required analysis of the data from survey. The results are achieved through factor analysis at the perspective of NPD in some of Malaysian and Iranian manufacturing firms. The 20 new product development factors were grouped into five higher level constructs. It gives valuable insight and guidelines which hopefully will help managers of firms in developing countries to consider the main factors in NPD.

Item Type:	MPRA Paper
Original Title:	Envisages of New Product Developments in Small and Medium Enterprises through Virtual Team
English Title:	Envisages of New Product Developments in Small and Medium Enterprises through Virtual Team
Language:	English
Keywords:	Survey Finding, New Product Development, Factor Analysis, Virtual Team
Subjects:	L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance > L11 - Production, Pricing, and Market Structure; Size Distribution of Firms R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R3 - Real Estate Markets, Production Analysis, and Firm Location O - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Technological Change; Research and Development; Intellectual Property Rights > O32 - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D L - Industrial Organization > L7 - Industry Studies: Primary Products and Construction O - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development M - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting > M1 - Business Administration > M11 - Production Management M - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting > M5 - Personnel Economics > M54 - Labor Management P - Economic Systems > P4 - Other Economic Systems > P42 - Productive Enterprises; Factor and Product Markets; Prices; Population O - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Technological Change; Research and Development; Intellectual Property Rights L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance > L15 - Information and Product Quality; Standardization and Compatibility
Item ID:	26984
Depositing User:	Nader Ale Ebrahim
Date Deposited:	26. Nov 2010 13:56
Last Modified:	14. Feb 2013 08:35
References:	1. Chen, H.H., et al., Developing new products with knowledge management methods and process development management in a network. Computers in Industry, 2008. 59: p. 242–253. 2. Mi, X., W. Shen, and W. Zhao, Research on Internet-Based System Architecture for Collaborative Product Development, in Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design II. 2006, Springer Berlin / Heidelberg. p. 394-403. 3. Pihkala, T., E. Varamaki, and J. Vesalainen, Virtual organization and the SMEs: a review and model development. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 1999. 11(4): p. 335 - 349. 4. May, A. and C. Carter, A case study of virtual team working in the European automotive industry. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 2001. 27: p. 171-186. 5. Kratzer, J., R. Leenders, and J.V. Engelen, Keeping Virtual R&D Teams Creative. Industrial Research Institute, Inc., 2005. March-April: p. 13-16. 6. Mishra, A.A. and R. Shah, In union lies strength: Collaborative competence in new product development and its performance effects. Journal of Operations Management, 2009. 27(4): p. 324-338. 7. Leenders, R.T.A.J., J.M.L.V. Engelen, and J. Kratzer, Virtuality, communication, and new product team creativity: a social network perspective. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 2003. 20: p. 69–92. 8. Ale Ebrahim, N., S. Ahmed, and Z. Taha. A Conceptual Model of Virtual Product Development Process. in 2nd Seminar on Engineering and Information Technology, SEIT 2009. 2009. Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia. 9. Johansen, K., Collaborative Product Introduction within Extended Enterprises, in Department of Mechanical Engineering. 2005, Linköpings Universitet: Linköping, Sweden. p. 134. 10. Loch, C. and S. Kavadias, Handbook of New Product Development Management. 2008: Butterworth- Heinemann is an imprint of Elsevier. 560. 11. Griffin, A. and S. Somermeyer, The PDMA ToolBook 3 for New Product Development. 2007: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 12. Krishnan, V. and K.T. Ulrich, Product Development Decisions: A Review of the Literature. Management Science, 2001. 47(1): p. 1. 13. Jacobsa, J., et al., Exploring defect causes in products developed by virtual teams Information and Software Technology, 2005. 47(6): p. 399-410. 14. Badrinarayanan, V. and D.B. Arnett, Effective virtual new product development teams: an integrated framework. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 2008. 23(4): p. 242-248. 15. Schmidt, J.B., M.M. Montoya-Weiss, and A.P. Massey, New product development decision-making effectiveness: Comparing individuals, face-to-face teams, and virtual teams. Decision Sciences, 2001. 32(4): p. 1-26. 16. Durmusoglu, S.S. and R.J. Calantone, Is more information technology better for new product development? Product & Brand Management, 2006. 15(7): p. 435-441. 17. Ozer, M., The role of the Internet in new product performance: A conceptual investigation. Industrial Marketing Management 2004. 33: p. 355– 369. 18. Ozer, M., Information Technology and New Product Development Opportunities and Pitfalls. Industrial Marketing Management 2000. 29(5): p. 387-396. 19. Cummings, J.L. and B.S. Teng, Transferring R&D knowledge: the key factors affecting knowledge transfer success. Journal of Engineering Technology Management, 2003(20): p. 39–68. 20. McDonough, E.F., K.B. Kahn, and G. Barczak, An investigation of the use of global, virtual, and collocated new product development teams. The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2001. 18(2): p. 110–120. 21. Taifi, N., Organizational Collaborative Model of Small and Medium Enterprises in the Extended Enterprise Era: Lessons to Learn from a Large Automotive Company and its dealers’ Network., in Proceedings of the 2nd PROLEARN Doctoral Consortium on Technology Enhanced Learning, in the 2nd European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning. 2007, CEUR Workshop Proceedings.: Crete, Greece. 22. Susman, G.I., et al., Recognition and reconciliation of differences in interpretation of misalignments when collaborative technologies are introduced into new product development teams. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 2003. 20(1-2): p. 141–159. 23. Jeong, I., A cross-national study of the relationship between international diversification and new product performance. International Marketing Review, 2003. 20(4): p. 353-376. 24. Martinez-Sanchez, A., et al., Teleworking and new product development. European Journal of Innovation Management, 2006. 9(2): p. 202-214. 25. Robles-Estrada, C. and M. Gómez-Suárez. E-Business Adoption in the SME’s: towards an Integrated Theoretical-Empirical Research Framework. in The 10th International Conference on Global Business & Economic Development , Creativity & Innovation: Imperatives for Global Business and Development. 2007. Ryukoku University Fukakusa Campus, Kyoto, Japan. 26. Eikebrokk, T.R. and D.H. Olsen, An empirical investigation of competency factors affecting e-business success in European SMEs. Information & Management, 2007. 44(4): p. 364-383 27. Kotelnikov, V., Small and Medium Enterprises and ICT, in Asia-Pacific Development Information Programme (UNDP-APDIP) e-Primers for the Information Economy, Society and Polity, K. Hak-Su, Editor. 2007, UNDP Regional Centre: Bangkok. 28. Acs, Z.J., et al., The Internationalization of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises: A Policy Perspective. Small Business Economics, 1997. 9: p. 7–20. 29. Schröder, H.H., Past, Present and Future of Knowledge Integration, in Knowledge Integration-The Practice of Knowledge Management in Small and Medium Enterprises, A. Jetter, et al., Editors. 2006, Physica-Verlag HD. p. 175-191. 30. Choi, T.Y., Korea's Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises: Unsung Heroes or Economic Laggards? Academy of Management Executive, 2003. 17(2). 31. Mezgar, I., G.L. Kovacs, and P. Paganelli, Co-operative production planning for small- and medium-sized enterprises. International Journal of Production Economics, 2000. 64: p. 37-48. 32. Raymond, L. and A.M. Croteau, Enabling the strategic development of SMEs through advanced manufacturing systems A configurational perspective. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 2006. 106(7): p. 1012-1032. 33. O’Regan, N. and A. Ghobadian, Testing the homogeneity of SMEs - The impact of size on managerial and organisational processes. European Business Review, 2004. 16(1). 34. Ayyagari, M., T. Beck, and A. Demirguc-Kunt, Small and Medium Enterprises Across the Globe. Small Business Economics, 2007. 29(4): p. 415-434. 35. Deros, B.M., S.M. Yusof, and A.M. Salleh, A benchmarking implementation framework for automotive manufacturing SMEs. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 2006. 13(4). 36. Tiwari, R. and S. Buse, Barriers to Innovation in SMEs: Can the Internationalization of R&D Mitigate Their Effects?, in Proceedings of the First European Conference on Knowledge for Growth: Role and Dynamics of Corporate R&D (CONCORD 2007). 2007: Seville, Spain. p. 1-32. 37. Fathian, M., P. Akhavan, and M. Hoorali, E-readiness assessment of non-profit ICT SMEs in a developing country: The case of Iran. Technovation, 2008. 28(9): p. 578-590. 38. CBI. SMEs Definition in Iran. 2009 [cited 2009 28, August, 2009]; Available from: http://tsd.cbi.ir/IntTSD/EnDisplay/Display.aspx. 39. ISIPO. Iran Small Industries & Industrial Parks Organization. 2009 [cited 2009 28, August, 2009]; Available from: http://www.iraniec.ir/Site.aspx?ParTree=13181311. 40. NSDC, Definitions for Small and Medium Enterprises in Malaysia, N.S.D. Council, Editor. 2005, Secretariat to National SME Development Council-Bank Negara Malaysia. 41. Laforet, S. and J. Tann, Innovative characteristics of small manufacturing firms. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 2006. 13(3): p. 363 - 380. 42. Hoffman, K., et al., Small firms, R&D, technology and innovation in the UK: a literature review. Technovation 1998. 18(1): p. 39-55 43. Barnett, E. and J. Storey, Managers’ accounts of innovation processes in small and medium-sized enterprises. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 2000. 7(4): p. 315 - 324. 44. Perrini, F., A. Russo, and A. Tencati, CSR Strategies of SMEs and Large Firms. Evidence from Italy. Journal of Business Ethics, 2007. 74(3): p. 285-300. 45. Corso, M., et al., Knowledge management configurations in Italian small-to-medium enterprises. Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 2003. 14(1): p. 46-56. 46. Hanna, V. and K. Walsh, Small Firm Networks: A Successful Approach to Innovation? . R&D Management, 2002. 32(3): p. 201-207. 47. Pullen, A., et al., Configurations of external SME characteristics to explain differences in innovation performance, in High Technology Small Firms Conference 2008: Twente University,Netherlands. 48. Zhan, H.F., et al., A web-based collaborative product design platform for dispersed network manufacturing. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2003. 138(1-3): p. 600-604. 49. Miles, R.E., C.C. Snow, and G. Miles, TheFuture.org Long Range Planning, 2000. 33(3): p. 300-321. 50. Redoli, J., et al., A model for the assessment and development of Internet-based information and communication services in small and medium enterprises Technovation, 2008. 28(7): p. 424-435. 51. Lan, H., et al., A web-based manufacturing service system for rapid product development Computers in Industry, 2004. 54(1): p. 51 - 67 52. Romero, F., et al., Activity modelling in a collaborative ceramic tile design chain: an enhanced IDEF0 approach. Research Engineering Design, 2008. 19: p. 1-20. 53. Zhouying, J., Globalization, technological competitiveness and the ‘catch-up’ challenge for developing countries: some lessons of experience. International Journal of Technology Management and Sustainable Development 2005. 4(1): p. 35-46 54. O’Regan, N., A. Ghobadian, and M. Sims, Fast tracking innovation in manufacturing SMEs Technovation, 2006. 26(2): p. 251-261 55. Gassmann, O. and M.M. Keupp, The competitive advantage of early and rapidly internationalising SMEs in the biotechnology industry: A knowledge-based view. Journal of World Business, 2007. 42(3): p. 350- 366. 56. Buyukozkan, G., A. Baykasoglu, and T. Dereli, Integration of Internet and web-based tools in new product development process. Production Planning & Control, 2007. 18(1): p. 44-53. 57. Levy, M., C. Loebbecke, and P. Powell, SMEs, co-opetition and knowledge sharing: the role of information systems. European Journal of Information Systems, 2003. 12(1): p. 3-17 58. Egbu, C.O., S. Hari, and S.H. Renukappa, Knowledge management for sustainable competitiveness in small and medium surveying practices. Structural Survey, 2005. 23(1): p. 7-21. 59. Sills, S.J. and C. Song, Innovations in Survey Research: An Application of Web-Based Surveys. Social Science Computer Review, 2002. 20(1): p. 22-30. 60. Denscombe, M., Web-Based Questionnaires and the Mode Effect: An Evaluation Based on Completion Rates and Data Contents of Near-Identical Questionnaires Delivered in Different Modes. Social Science Computer Review, 2006. 24(2): p. 246-254. 61. Gosling, S.D., et al., Should We Trust Web-Based Studies? A Comparative Analysis of Six Preconceptions About Internet Questionnaires. American Psychologist, 2004. 59(2): p. 93-104. 62. Deutskens, E., K. de Ruyter, and M. Wetzels, An assessment of equivalence between online and mail surveys in service research. Journal of Service Research, 2006. 8(4): p. 346-355. 63. Cronbach, L., Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 1951. 16(3): p. 297-334. 64. Akgün, A.E., M. Dayan, and A.D. Benedetto, New product development team intelligence: Antecedents and consequences Information & Management 2008. 45(4): p. 221-226. 65. Ale Ebrahim, N., S. Ahmed, and Z. Taha, Virtual Teams: a Literature Review. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 2009. 3(3): p. 2653-2669
URI:	http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/26984

All papers reproduced by permission. Reproduction and distribution subject to the approval of the copyright owners.

Envisages of New Product Developments in Small and Medium Enterprises through Virtual Team - Munich Personal RePEc Archive