::::::: Technological Information Search Service :::::::

Industrial Engineering and Management Systems / v.10, no.2, 2011년, pp.109-114

http://dx.doi.org/10.7232/iems.2011.10.2.109

The Effectiveness of Virtual R&D Teams in SMEs: Experiences of Malaysian SMEs

Ale Ebrahim, Nader (Department of Engineering Design and Manufacture, Faculty of Engineering, University of Malaya Kuala Lumpur) Abdul Rashid, Salwa Hanim (Centre for Product Design and Manufacturing, Faculty of Engineering, University of Malaya) Ahmed, Shamsuddin (Department of Engineering Design and Manufacture, Faculty of Engineering, University of Malaya Kuala Lumpur) Taha, Zahari (Faculty of Manufacturing Engineering and Management Technology, University Malaysia Pahang)

Abstract The number of small and medium enterprises (SMEs), especially those involved with research and development (R&D) programs and employed virtual teams to create the greatest competitive advantage from limited labor are increasing. Global and localized virtual R&D teams are believed to have high potential for the growth of SMEs. Due to the fast-growing complexity of new products coupled with new emerging opportunities of virtual teams, a collaborative approach is believed to be the future trend. This research explores the effectiveness of virtuality in SMEs' virtual R&D teams. Online questionnaires were emailed to Malaysian manufacturing SMEs and 74 usable questionnaires were received, representing a 20.8 percent return rate. In order to avoid biases which may result from pre-suggested answers, a series of open-ended questions were retrieved from the experts. This study was focused on analyzing an open-ended question, whereby four main themes were extracted from the experts' recommendations regarding the effectiveness of virtual teams for the growth and performance of SMEs. The findings of this study would be useful to product design managers of SMEs in order to realize the key advantages and significance of virtual R&D teams during the new product development (NPD) process. This is turn, leads to increased effectiveness in new product development's procedure.

Keyword Virtual Teams; New Product Development; Survey Finding; Small and Medium Enterprises

Reference (29)

1. Abdul Rashid, S. H. (2009), An investigation into the material efficiency practices of UK manufacturers, PhD Thesis, Cranfield University. 2. Ale Ebrahim, N., Ahmed, S., and Taha, Z. (2009a), Innovation and R&D Activities in Virtual Team, European Journal of Scientific Research, 34, 297-307. 3. Ale Ebrahim, N., Ahmed, S., and Taha, Z. (2009b), Virtual R&D teams in small and medium enterprises: A literature review, Scientific Research and Essay, 4, 1575-1590. 4. Ale Ebrahim, N., Ahmed, S., and Taha, Z. (2009c), Virtual Teams for New Product Develop-ment-An Innovative Experience for R&D Engineers, European Journal of Educational Studies, 1, 109-123. 5. Ale Ebrahim, N., Ahmed, S., and Taha, Z. (2010), SMEs; Virtual research and development (R&D) teams and new product development: A literature review International Journal of the Physical Sciences, 5, 916-930. 6. Bobrow, E. E. (1997), The complete idiot's guide to new product development, New York, Alpha Books. 7. Bouchard, L. and CASSIVI, L. (2004), Assessment of a Web-groupware technology for virtual teams, IAMOT 2004. Washington, D. C. 8. Corso, M., Martini, A., Paolucci, E., and PELLEGRINI, L. (2003), Knowledge management configurations in Italian small-to-medium enter-prises, Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 14, 46-56. 9. Denscombe, M. (2006), Web-Based Questionnaires and the Mode Effect: An Evaluation Based on Completion Rates and Data Contents of Near-Identical Questionnaires Delivered in Different Modes, Social Science Computer Review, 24, 246-254. 10. Ebrahim, N. A., Ahmed, S., and Taha, Z. (2010), Virtual R&D teams and SMEs growth: A comparative study between Iranian and Malaysian SMEs, African Journal of Business Management, 4, 2368-2379. 11. Egbu, C. O., Hari, S., and Renukappa, S. H. (2005), Knowledge management for sustainable competitiveness in small and medium surveying practices, Structural Survey, 23, 7-21. 12. Eikebrokk, T. R. and Olsen, D. H. (2007), An empirical investigation of competency factors affect-ing ebusiness success in European SMEs, Information and Management, 44, 364-383. 13. Flores, M. (2006), IFIP International Federation for Information Processing. Network-Centric Collaboration and Supporting Fireworks, Boston: Springer. 14. Gassmann, O. and KEUPP, M. M. (2007), The competitive advantage of early and rapidly internationalising SMEs in the biotechnology industry: A knowledge-based view. Journal of World Business, 42, 350-366. 15. Gassmann, O. and Von Zedtwitz, M. (1999), Organizing virtual R&D teams: towards a con-tingency approach. In: IEEE Management of Engineering and Technology, Technology and Innovation Management. PICMET '99, Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology, Portland, OR, USA. 198-199. 16. Gassmann, O. and Von Zedtwitz, M. (2003), Trends and determinants of managing virtual R&D teams, R&D Management, 33, 243-262. 17. Hanna, V. and Walsh, K. (2002), Small Firm Networks: A Successful Approach to Innovation? R&D Management, 32, 201-207. 18. Hertel, G. T., Geister, S., and Konradt, U. (2005), Managing virtual teams: A review of current empirical research, Human Resource Management Review, 15, 69-95. 19. Hoffman, K., Parejo, M., Bessant, J., and Perren, L. (1998), Small firms, R&D, technology and innovation in the UK: a literature review, Technovation, 18, 39-55. 20. Kratzer, J., Leenders, R., and Engelen, J. V. (2005), Keeping Virtual R&D Teams Creative, Research Technology Management, 1, 13-16. 21. Levy, M., Loebbecke, C., and Powell, P. (2003), SMEs, coopetition and knowledge sharing: the role of information systems, European Journal of Information Systems, 12, 3-17. 22. May, A. and Carter, C. (2001), A case study of virtual team working in the European automotive industry, Inter-national Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 27, 171-186. 23. Mezgar, I., Kovacs, G. L., and Paganelli, P. (2000), Cooperative production planning for small- and mediumsized enterprises, International Journal of Production Economics, 64, 37-48. 24. Munkvold, B. E. and Zigurs, I. (2007), Process and technology challenges in swift-starting virtual teams, Information and Management, 44, 287-299. 25. Perrini, F., Russo, A., and Tencati, A. (2007), CSR Strategies of SMEs and Large Firms. Evidence from Italy, Journal of Business Ethics, 74, 285-300. 26. Pihkala, T., Varamaki, E., and Vesalainen, J. (1999), Virtual organization and the SMEs: a review and model development, Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 11, 335-349. 27. Pullen, A., Weerd-Nederhof, P. D., Groen, A., and Fisscher, O. (2008), Configurations of ex-ternal SME characteristics to explain differences in innovation performance, High Technology Small Firms Conference Twente University, Netherlands. 28. Raymond, L. and Croteau, A. M. (2006), Enabling the strategic development of SMEs through advanced manufacturing systems A configurational perspective, Industrial Management and Data Systems, 106, 1012-1032. 29. Sorli, M., Stokic, D., Gorostiza, A., and Campos, A. (2006), Managing product/process knowledge in the concurrent/simultaneous enterprise environment, Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 22, 399-408.

Industrial Engineering and Management Systems / v.10, no.2, 2011 Year, pp.109-114

Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers

pISSN : 1598-7248

eISSN :

http://dx.doi.org/10.7232/iems.2011.10.2.109

UCI :G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO201119342675804)

Language : English

::::::: Technological Information Search Service :::::::