Tuesday, 28 February 2017
Monday, 27 February 2017
Friday, 24 February 2017
The “virtual team player” - Nov 24, 2016
Source: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/2041386616675522
A review and initial model of knowledge, skills,
First Published November 24, 2016
research-article
The “virtual team player” - Nov 24, 2016
The “virtual team player”
A review and initial model of knowledge, skills,
abilities, and other characteristics for virtual collaboration
First Published November 24, 2016
research-article
 |
 |
Abstract
In
spite of the increasing demand for virtual cooperation, still
relatively little is known about the knowledge, skills, abilities, and
other characteristics (KSAOs) individuals need for virtual teamwork.
Thus, the current paper aims at synthesizing the existing literature
into a comprehensive model of virtual teamwork KSAOs. To this end, we
review (a) existing frameworks of KSAO requirements for virtual
teamwork, (b) challenges posed by different facets of virtuality, and
(c) KSAOs particularly relevant for meeting the identified challenges.
The results of this review are integrated into a holistic model of
virtual teamwork KSAOs with distal characteristics (personality,
experience) and more proximal qualities (knowledge, skills, and
motivation). Research gaps as well as avenues for future research will
be outlined and applications for virtual team staffing and training will
be discussed.
spite of the increasing demand for virtual cooperation, still
relatively little is known about the knowledge, skills, abilities, and
other characteristics (KSAOs) individuals need for virtual teamwork.
Thus, the current paper aims at synthesizing the existing literature
into a comprehensive model of virtual teamwork KSAOs. To this end, we
review (a) existing frameworks of KSAO requirements for virtual
teamwork, (b) challenges posed by different facets of virtuality, and
(c) KSAOs particularly relevant for meeting the identified challenges.
The results of this review are integrated into a holistic model of
virtual teamwork KSAOs with distal characteristics (personality,
experience) and more proximal qualities (knowledge, skills, and
motivation). Research gaps as well as avenues for future research will
be outlined and applications for virtual team staffing and training will
be discussed.
References
| Ale Ebrahim N., Ahmed S., Taha Z. (2009). Virtual teams: A literature review. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 3, 2653–2669. Google Scholar |
The “virtual team player” - Nov 24, 2016
Saturday, 11 February 2017
Supply Chain Management Practices and Product Development: A Moderated Mediation Model of Supply Chain Responsiveness, Organization Structure, and Research and Development | Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Systems , Vol 16, No 01 | World Scientific
Source: http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/ref/10.1142/S0219686717500032
Supply Chain
Supply Chain Management Practices and Product Development: A Moderated Mediation Model of Supply Chain Responsiveness, Organization Structure, and Research and Development | Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Systems , Vol 16, No 01 | World Scientific
Faheem Gul Gilal et al,
J. Adv. Manuf. Syst.
16, 35 (2017).
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0219686717500032
J. Adv. Manuf. Syst.
16, 35 (2017).
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0219686717500032
Supply Chain
Management Practices and Product Development: A Moderated Mediation
Model of Supply Chain Responsiveness, Organization Structure, and
Research and Development
References:
- 1. G. W. Fuller , New Food Product Development: From Concept to Marketplace (CRC Press, 2016).
- 2. B. J. Zirger and M. A. Maidique , A model of new product development: An empirical test, Management Science 36 (7) (1990) 867–883. [CrossRef] [ISI]
3. I. I. Perry and F. John, The impact of supply chain business
processes on competitive advantage and organizational performance, No.
AFIT/LSCM/ENS/12-14, Air Force Inst of Tech Wright-Patterson AFB OH
School Of Engineering And Management (2012).- 4. N. A. Ebrahim , Virtual R&D teams: A new model for product development, International Journal of Innovation 3 (2) (2015) 1. [CrossRef] [ISI]
5. S. Li, B. Ragu-Nathan, T. S. Ragu-Nathan and S. S. Rao , The
impact of supply chain management practices on competitive advantage and
organizational performance, Omega 34 (2) (2006) 107–124. [CrossRef] [ISI]
6. S. C. Lenny Koh, M. Demirbag, E. Bayraktar, E. Tatoglu and S.
Zaim , The impact of supply chain management practices on performance
of SMEs, Industrial Management and Data Systems 107 (1) (2007) 103–124. [CrossRef] [ISI]- 7. T. Schoenherr and M. Swink , The roles of supply chain intelligence and adaptability in new product launch success, Decision Sciences 46 (5) (2015) 901–936. [CrossRef] [ISI]
8. M. Morita, J. A. Machuca, E. J. Flynn and J. L. P. de los Ríos
, Aligning product characteristics and the supply chain process — A
normative perspective, International Journal of Production Economics 161 (2015) 228–241. [CrossRef] [ISI]- 9. E. Mazzola, M. Bruccoleri and G. Perrone , Supply chain of innovation and new product development, Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management 21 (4) (2015) 273–284. [CrossRef] [ISI]
10. R. Aydin, C. K. Kwong and P. Ji , Coordination of the
closed-loop supply chain for product line design with consideration of
remanufactured products, Journal of Cleaner Production 114 (2016) 286–298. [CrossRef] [ISI]
11. G. L. Ragatz, R. B. Handfield and K. J. Petersen , Benefits
associated with supplier integration into new product development under
conditions of technology uncertainty, Journal of Business Research 55 (5) (2002) 389–400. [CrossRef] [ISI]- 12. A. Walter , Relationship-specific factors influencing supplier involvement in customer new product development, Journal of Business Research 56 (9) (2003) 721–733. [CrossRef] [ISI]
13. D. Luzzini, M. Amann, F. Caniato, M. Essig and S. Ronchi ,
The path of innovation: Purchasing and supplier involvement into new
product development, Industrial Marketing Management 47 (2015) 109–120. [CrossRef] [ISI]
14. K. D. Wowak, C. W. Craighead, D. J. Ketchen and G. T. M. Hult ,
Toward a “theoretical toolbox” for the supplier-enabled fuzzy front
end of the new product development process, Journal of Supply Chain Management 52 (1) (2016) 66–81. [CrossRef] [ISI]- 15. K. Brockhoff , Customers’ perspectives of involvement in new product development, International Journal of Technology Management 26 (5–6) (2003) 464–481. [CrossRef] [ISI]
16. M. Sigala , Social networks and customer involvement in new
service development (NSD) The case of www. mystarbucksidea.Com, International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management 24 (7) (2012) 966–990. [CrossRef] [ISI]- 17. R. Filieri , Consumer co-creation and new product development: A case study in the food industry, Marketing Intelligence and Planning 31 (1) (2013) 40–53. [CrossRef]
18. A. S. Cui and F. Wu , The impact of customer involvement on new
product development: Contingent and substitutive effects, Journal of Product Innovation Management 34 (1) (2016) 60–80. [CrossRef] [ISI]
19. B. Menguc, S. Auh and P. Yannopoulos , Customer and supplier
involvement in design: The moderating role of incremental and radical
innovation capability, Journal of Product Innovation Management 31 (2) (2014) 313–328. [CrossRef] [ISI]- 20. S. Min and J. T. Mentzer , Developing and measuring supply chain management concepts, Journal of Business Logistics 25 (1) (2004) 63–99. [CrossRef]
21. S. T. Cavusgil and E. Cavusgil , Reflections on international
marketing: Destructive regeneration and multinational firms, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 40 (2) (2012) 202–217. [CrossRef] [ISI]
22. S. Perçin and H. Min , A hybrid quality function deployment and
fuzzy decision-making methodology for the optimal selection of
third-party logistics service providers, International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications 16 (5) (2013) 380–397. [CrossRef]
23. W. Yu, M. A. Jacobs, W. D. Salisbury and H. Enns , The
effects of supply chain integration on customer satisfaction and
financial performance: An organizational learning perspective, International Journal of Production Economics 146 (1) (2013) 346–358. [CrossRef] [ISI]
24. T. A. Chin and H. H. Tat , Does gender diversity moderate the
relationship between supply chain management practice and performance in
the electronic manufacturing services industry? International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications 18 (1) (2015) 35–45. [CrossRef]
25. A. Paulraj, I. J. Chen and C. Blome , Motives and performance
outcomes of sustainable supply chain management practices: A
multi-theoretical perspective, Journal of Business Ethics (2015) 1–20, doi:
[10.1007/s10551-015-2857-0]
.- 26. D. A. Marshall , Assessing the value of supply chain information sharing in the new millennium, International Journal of Supply Chain Management 4 (4) (2015) 10–21.
27. S. Qrunfleh and M. Tarafdar , Supply chain management
practices–IT utilisation alignment: Impact on supply chain performance
and firm performance, International Journal of Business Information Systems 18 (4) (2015) 364–389. [CrossRef]- 28. S. C. Graves and T. Schoenmeyr , Strategic safety-stock placement in supply chains with capacity constraints, Manufacturing and Service Operations Management 18 (3) (2016) 445–460. [CrossRef] [ISI]
- 29. F. Firouzi, M. Y. Jaber and E. Baglieri , Trust in supply forecast information sharing, International Journal of Production Research 54 (5) (2016) 1322–1333. [CrossRef] [ISI]
30. Y. Shi, A. Zhang, T. Arthanari and Y. Liu , Third-party
purchase: An empirical study of Chinese third-party logistics users, International Journal of Operations and Production Management 36 (3) (2016) 286–307. [CrossRef] [ISI]
31. M. M. Wilhelm, C. Blome, V. Bhakoo and A. Paulraj ,
Sustainability in multi-tier supply chains: Understanding the double
agency role of the first-tier supplier, Journal of Operations Management 41 (2016) 42–60. [CrossRef] [ISI]
32. E. Tatoglu, E. Bayraktar, I. Golgeci, S. L. Koh, M. Demirbag
and S. Zaim , How do supply chain management and information systems
practices influence operational performance? Evidence from emerging
country SMEs, International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications 19 (3) (2016) 181–199. [CrossRef]- 33. S. Emmett and B. Crocker , The Relationship-Driven Supply Chain: Creating a Culture of Collaboration Throughout the Chain (CRC Press, 2016).
34. H. Moradlou and C. J. Backhouse , A review of manufacturing
re-shoring in the context of customer-focused postponement strategies, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture (2016), doi:
[10.1177/0954405415623486]
.- 35. S. Brockhaus, S.
Fawcett, W. Kersten and M. Knemeyer , A framework for benchmarking
product sustainability efforts: Using systems dynamics to achieve supply
chain alignment, Benchmarking: An International Journal 23 (1) (2016) 127–164. [CrossRef]
36. K. R. Lou and L. Wang , Nash and integrated solutions in a
just-in-time seller–buyer supply chain with buyer’s ordering cost
reductions, International Journal of Systems Science 47 (7) (2016) 1615–1623. [CrossRef] [ISI]- 37. M. Eskandarian, G. Marthandan, C. A. Malarvizhi and S. Z. Tehrani , Quality in e-procurement success, International Journal of Management and Information Systems 20 (3) (2016) 73.
38. B. K. Brockman and R. M. Morgan , The moderating effect of
organizational cohesiveness in knowledge use and new product
development, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 34 (3) (2006) 295–307. [CrossRef] [ISI]
39. J. Mu and C. A. Di Benedetto , Strategic orientations and new
product commercialization: Mediator, moderator, and interplay, R&D Management 41 (4) (2011) 337–359. [CrossRef] [ISI]
40. B. D. Williams, J. Roh, T. Tokar and M. Swink , Leveraging
supply chain visibility for responsiveness: The moderating role of
internal integration, Journal of Operations Management 31 (7) (2013) 543–554. [CrossRef] [ISI]
41. M. Kim, N. C. Suresh and C. Kocabasoglu-Hillmer , An impact of
manufacturing flexibility and technological dimensions of manufacturing
strategy on improving supply chain responsiveness: Business environment
perspective, International Journal of Production Research 51 (18) (2013) 5597–5611. [CrossRef] [ISI]- 42. S. H. Hum and M. Parlar , Measurement and optimization of supply chain responsiveness, IIE Transactions 46 (1) (2014) 1–22. [CrossRef] [ISI]
43. M. Jahre and N. Fabbe-Costes , How standards and modularity can
improve humanitarian supply chain responsiveness: The case of emergency
response units, Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management 5 (3) (2015) 348–386. [CrossRef]
44. E. Sandberg , Restructuring the supply chain to meet customer
demands — The supply chain responsiveness of a Swedish wholesaler, The 20th Annual International Symposium on Logistics (ISL), Bologna, Italy (2015), pp. 36–37.
45. J. Moyano-Fuentes, M. Sacristán-Díaz and P. Garrido-Vega ,
Improving supply chain responsiveness through Advanced Manufacturing
Technology: The mediating role of internal and external integration, Production Planning and Control 27 (2016) 686–697. [CrossRef] [ISI]
46. A. A. Thatte, S. S. Rao and T. S. Ragu-Nathan , Impact of SCM
practices of a firm on supply chain responsiveness and competitive
advantage of a firm, Journal of Applied Business Research 29 (2) (2013) 499–530. [CrossRef]
47. S. Qrunfleh and M. Tarafdar , Lean and agile supply chain
strategies and supply chain responsiveness: The role of strategic
supplier partnership and postponement, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 18 (6) (2013) 571–582. [CrossRef] [ISI]- 48. S. L. Brown and K. M. Eisenhardt , Product development: Past research, present findings, and future directions, Academy of Management Review 20 (2) (1995) 343–378. [ISI]
49. T. Morgan, S. Anokhin, A. Kretinin and J. Frishammar , The
dark side of the entrepreneurial orientation and market orientation
interplay: A new product development perspective, International Small Business Journal 33 (7) (2015) 731–751. [CrossRef] [ISI]
50. A. De Massis, J. Kotlar, F. Frattini, J. J. Chrisman and M.
Nordqvist , Family governance at work organizing for new product
development in family SMEs, Family Business Review (2016), doi:
[10.1177/0894486515622722]
. [CrossRef] [ISI]
51. R. B. Handfield and C. Bechtel , The role of trust and
relationship structure in improving supply chain responsiveness, Industrial Marketing Management 31 (4) (2002) 367–382. [CrossRef] [ISI]
52. P. Danese, P. Romano and M. Formentini , The impact of supply
chain integration on responsiveness: The moderating effect of using an
international supplier network, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 49 (1) (2013) 125–140. [CrossRef] [ISI]
53. E. Cantor, D. , J. Blackhurst, M. Pan and M. Crum ,
Examining the role of stakeholder pressure and knowledge management on
supply chain risk and demand responsiveness, The International Journal of Logistics Management 25 (1) (2014) 202–223. [CrossRef] [ISI]
54. Z. Cai, Q. Huang, H. Liu and L. Liang , The moderating role
of information technology capability in the relationship between supply
chain collaboration and organizational responsiveness: Evidence from
China, International Journal of Operations and Production Management 36 (10) (2016) 1247–1271. [CrossRef] [ISI]
55. Q. Zhu and J. Sarkis , Relationships between operational
practices and performance among early adopters of green supply chain
management practices in Chinese manufacturing enterprises, Journal of Operations Management 22 (3) (2004) 265–289. [CrossRef] [ISI]
56. A. Oke, D. I. Prajogo and J. Jayaram , Strengthening the
innovation chain: The role of internal innovation climate and strategic
relationships with supply chain partners, Journal of Supply Chain Management 49 (4) (2013) 43–58. [CrossRef] [ISI]- 57. Z. Liu, D. Prajogo and A. Oke , Supply chain technologies: Linking adoption, utilization, and performance, Journal of Supply Chain Management 52 (4) (2016) 22–41. [CrossRef] [ISI]
- 58. D. S. Pugh, D. J. Hickson, C. R. Hinings and C. Turner , Dimensions of organization structure, Administrative Science Quarterly 1 (1968) 65–105. [CrossRef] [ISI]
- 59. J. Child , Predicting and understanding organization structure, Administrative Science Quarterly 1 (1973) 168–185. [CrossRef] [ISI]
60. L. A. Gordon and V. K. Narayanan , Management accounting
systems, perceived environmental uncertainty and organization structure:
An empirical investigation, Accounting, Organizations and Society 9 (1) (1984) 33–47. [CrossRef] [ISI]
61. J. G. Covin and D. P. Slevin , The influence of organization
structure on the utility of an entrepreneurial top management style, Journal of Management Studies 25 (3) (1988) 217–234. [CrossRef] [ISI]
62. R. C. Levin, A. K. Klevorick, R. R. Nelson, S. G. Winter, R.
Gilbert and Z. Griliches, Appropriating the returns from industrial
research and development, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1987(3) (1987) 783–831.- 63. N. R. Jennings, K. Sycara and M. Wooldridge , A roadmap of agent research and development, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 1 (1) (1998) 7–38. [CrossRef]
64. T. Elkins and R. T. Keller , Leadership in research and
development organizations: A literature review and conceptual framework,
The Leadership Quarterly 14 (4) (2003) 587–606. [CrossRef] [ISI]
65. R. M. Baron and D. A. Kenny , The moderator–mediator variable
distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and
statistical considerations, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51 (6) (1986) 1173. [CrossRef] [ISI]- 66. D. Muller, C. M. Judd and V. Y. Yzerbyt , When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 89 (6) (2005) 852. [CrossRef] [ISI]
67. J. R. Edwards and L. S. Lambert , Methods for integrating
moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated
path analysis, Psychological Methods 12 (1) (2007) 1. [CrossRef] [ISI]
68. K. J. Preacher, D. D. Rucker and A. F. Hayes , Addressing
moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions, Multivariate Behavioral Research 42 (1) (2007) 185–227. [CrossRef] [ISI]
69. F. G. Gilal, R. G. Gilal, J. Zhang, R. G. Gilal and N. G.
Gilal , Supply Chain management practices as a contemporary source of
securing competitive advantage and organizational performance: Evidence
from the FMCGs of Pakistan, International Journal of Information Systems and Change Management 8 (3), in press.- 70. A. Ghosh, S. Das and A. Deshpande , Effect of responsiveness and process integration in supply chain coordination, IUP Journal of Supply Chain Management 11 (1) (2014) 7.
- 71. G. Seebacher and H. Winkler , A capability approach to evaluate supply chain flexibility, International Journal of Production Economics 167 (2015) 177–186. [CrossRef] [ISI]
72. K. Fantazy and M. Salem , The value of strategy and flexibility
in new product development: The impact on performance, Journal of Enterprise Information Management 29 (4) (2016) 525–548. [CrossRef] [ISI]
73. S. Tyagi, A. Choudhary, X. Cai and K. Yang , Value stream
mapping to reduce the lead-time of a product development process, International Journal of Production Economics 160 (2015) 202–212. [CrossRef] [ISI]- 74. R. G. Cooper , Predevelopment activities determine new product success, Industrial Marketing Management 17 (3) (1988) 237–247. [CrossRef] [ISI]
- 75. W. Chang and S. A. Taylor , The effectiveness of customer participation in new product development: A meta-analysis, Journal of Marketing 80 (1) (2016) 47–64. [CrossRef] [ISI]
- 76. K. Talke and E. J. Hultink , Managing diffusion barriers when launching new products, Journal of Product Innovation Management 27 (4) (2010) 537–553. [CrossRef] [ISI]
- 77. S. H. Kim and S. Netessine , Collaborative cost reduction and component procurement under information asymmetry, Management Science 59 (1) (2013) 189–206. [CrossRef] [ISI]
78. R. Eltantawy, A. Paulraj, L. Giunipero, D. Naslund and A. A.
Thute , Towards supply chain coordination and productivity in a three
echelon supply chain: Action research study, International Journal of Operations and Production Management 35 (6) (2015) 895–924. [CrossRef] [ISI]- 79. S. B. Aissa and M. Goaied , Determinants of Tunisian hotel profitability: The role of managerial efficiency, Tourism Management 52 (2016) 478–487. [CrossRef] [ISI]
80. E. Bayraktar, M. Demirbag, S. L. Koh, E. Tatoglu and H. Zaim ,
A causal analysis of the impact of information systems and supply
chain management practices on operational performance: Evidence from
manufacturing SMEs in Turkey, International Journal of Production Economics 122 (1) (2009) 133–149. [CrossRef] [ISI]
81. E. Bayraktar, A. Gunasekaran, S. L. Koh, E. Tatoglu, M.
Demirbag and S. Zaim , An efficiency comparison of supply chain
management and information systems practices: A study of Turkish and
Bulgarian small-and medium-sized enterprises in food products and
beverages, International Journal of Production Research 48 (2) (2010) 425–451. [CrossRef] [ISI]
82. S. M. Ebrahimi, Examining the impact of supply chain integration
on organization structure and operational performance in oil and gas
supply chains: A contingency approach, Doctoral dissertation, University
of Sheffield (2015).- 83. J. D. Thompson , Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory (Transaction Publishers, 1967).
84. D. R. Dalton, W. D. Todor, M. J. Spendolini, G. J. Fielding
and L. W. Porter , Organization structure and performance: A critical
review, Academy of Management Review 5 (1) (1980) 49–64.
85. N. Erhardt, C. Martin-Rios and J. Harkins , Knowledge flow
from the top: The importance of teamwork structure in team sports, European Sport Management Quarterly 14 (4) (2014) 375–396. [CrossRef] [ISI]
86. R. Germain, C. Claycomb and C. Dröge , Supply chain
variability, organizational structure, and performance: The moderating
effect of demand unpredictability, Journal of Operations Management 26 (5) (2008) 557–570. [CrossRef] [ISI]
87. Q. Yinan, M. Tang and M. Zhang , Mass customization in flat
organization: The mediating role of supply chain planning and
corporation coordination, Journal of Applied Research and Technology 12 (2) (2014) 171–181. [CrossRef]
88. X. A. Koufteros and M. A. Vonderembse , The impact of
organizational structure on the level of JIT attainment: Towards theory
development, International Journal of Production Research 36 (10) (1998) 2863–2878. [CrossRef] [ISI]
89. A. Y. Nahm, M. A. Vonderembse and X. A. Koufteros , The impact
of organizational structure on time-based manufacturing and plant
performance, Journal of Operations Management 21 (3) (2003) 281–306. [CrossRef] [ISI]- 90. F. C. Lunenburg , Organizational structure: Mintzberg’s framework, International Journal of Scholarly, Academic, Intellectual Diversity 14 (1) (2012) 1–8.
91. D. Baumann-Pauly, C. Wickert, L. J. Spence and A. G. Scherer ,
Organizing corporate social responsibility in small and large firms:
Size matters, Journal of Business Ethics 115 (4) (2013) 693–705. [CrossRef] [ISI]- 92. R. W. Griffin , Fundamentals of Management (Cengage Learning, 2013).
- 93. A. M. Townsend, S. M. DeMarie and A. R. Hendrickson , Virtual teams: Technology and the workplace of the future, The Academy of Management Executive 12 (3) (1998) 17–29.
- 94. P. K. Humphreys, M. K. Lai and D. Sculli , An inter-organizational information system for supply chain management, International Journal of Production Economics 70 (3) (2001) 245–255. [CrossRef] [ISI]
95. A. Paulraj, A. A. Lado and I. J. Chen , Inter-organizational
communication as a relational competency: Antecedents and performance
outcomes in collaborative buyer–supplier relationships, Journal of Operations Management 26 (1) (2008) 45–64. [CrossRef] [ISI]
96. S. Gold, S. Seuring and P. Beske , Sustainable supply chain
management and inter-organizational resources: A literature review, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 17 (4) (2010) 230–245. [ISI]
97. R. Rajaguru and M. J. Matanda , Effects of inter-organizational
compatibility on supply chain capabilities: Exploring the mediating
role of inter-organizational information systems (IOIS) integration, Industrial Marketing Management 42 (4) (2013) 620–632. [CrossRef] [ISI]
98. J. M. Denolf, J. H. Trienekens, P. N. Wognum, J. G. van der
Vorst and S. O. Omta , Towards a framework of critical success factors
for implementing supply chain information systems, Computers in Industry 68 (2015) 16–26. [CrossRef] [ISI]
99. X. Zhang, D. P. Van Donk and T. van der Vaart , The different
impact of inter-organizational and intra-organizational ICT on suppy
chain performance, International Journal of Operations and Production Management 36 (7) (2016) 803–824. [CrossRef] [ISI]- 100. P. Arlow and M. J. Gannon , Social responsiveness, corporate structure, and economic performance, Academy of Management Review 7 (2) (1982) 235–241.
101. M. Perez-Valls, J. Cespedes-Lorente and J. Moreno-Garcia ,
Green practices and organizational design as sources of strategic
flexibility and performance, Business Strategy and the Environment (2015), doi:
[10.1002/bse.1881]
.- 102. J. Y. Lee, I. V.
Kozlenkova and R. W. Palmatier , Structural marketing: Using
organizational structure to achieve marketing objectives, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 43 (1) (2015) 73–99. [CrossRef] [ISI] - 103. E. A. Hoşgör , Organizational structure, Wiley Encyclopedia of Management 6 (2015) 1–6. [CrossRef]
104. J. Joseph, R. Klingebiel and A. J. Wilson , Organizational
structure and performance feedback: Centralization, aspirations, and
termination decisions, Organization Science 27 (5) (2016) 1065–1083. [CrossRef] [ISI]- 105. I. Garbie , Management for sustainability, in Sustainability in Manufacturing Enterprise (Springer International Publishing, 2016), pp. 81–89. [CrossRef]
106. M. Holweg, S. Disney, J. Holmström and J. Småros , Supply
chain collaboration: Making sense of the strategy continuum, European Management Journal 23 (2) (2005) 170–181. [CrossRef]- 107. R. R. Lummus, L. K. Duclos and R. J. Vokurka , Supply chain flexibility: Building a new model, Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management 4 (4) (2003) 1–13.
108. C. Liu, B. Huo, S. Liu and X. Zhao , Effect of information
sharing and process coordination on logistics outsourcing, Industrial Management and Data Systems 115 (1) (2015) 41–63. [CrossRef] [ISI]
109. J. G. van der Vorst, R. Ossevoort, M. de Keizer, T. van
Woensel, C. N. Verdouw, E. Wenink and R. van Willegen , DAVINC3I:
Towards collaborative responsive logistics networks in floriculture, in
Logistics and Supply Chain Innovation (Springer International Publishing, 2016), pp. 37–53. [CrossRef]
110. M. M. P. Marchesini and R. L. C. Alcântara , Logistics
activities in supply chain business process: A conceptual framework to
guide their implementation, The International Journal of Logistics Management 27 (1) (2016) 6–30. [CrossRef] [ISI]
111. T. Yan, T. Y. Choi, Y. Kim and Y. Yang , A theory of the
nexus supplier: A critical supplier from a network perspective, Journal of Supply Chain Management 51 (1) (2015) 52–66. [CrossRef] [ISI]
112. P. Y. Chu, K. H. Chang and H. F. Huang , How to increase
supplier flexibility through social mechanisms and influence strategies?
Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing 27 (2) (2012) 115–131. [CrossRef] [ISI]- 113. L. E. Gadde, H. Håkansson and G. Persson , Supply Network Strategies (John Wiley and Sons, 2010).
114. A. A. Thatte, V. Agrawal and S. Muhammed , Linking
information sharing and supplier network responsiveness with delivery
dependability of a firm, Journal of Applied Business Research 25 (3) (2011) 37–56.
115. Y. Kuo, T. Yang, D. Parker and C. H. Sung , Integration of
customer and supplier flexibility in a make-to-order industry, Industrial Management and Data Systems 116 (2) (2016) 213–235. [CrossRef] [ISI]
116. F. M. Armbrecht Jr , Industrial research institute’s 3rd annual
R&D leader board: R&D Spending by the Top 100 US technology
investors in 2000, Research-Technology Management 45 (1) (2002) 21.
117. D. M. Kim and G. D. Lee , Introduction to the technology,
applications, products, markets, R&D, and perspectives of nanofoods
in the food industry, Nanotechnology 25 (2006) 32–38.
118. M. Song and R. J. Thieme , A cross-national investigation of
the R&D–marketing interface in the product innovation process, Industrial Marketing Management 35 (3) (2006) 308–322. [CrossRef] [ISI]- 119. M. A. Schilling and C. W. Hill , Managing the new product development process: Strategic imperatives, The Academy of Management Executive 12 (3) (1998) 67–81.
- 120. L. Aarikka-Stenroos and B. Sandberg , From new-product development to commercialization through networks, Journal of Business Research 65 (2) (2012) 198–206. [CrossRef] [ISI]
- 121. A. Griffin and J. R. Hauser , The voice of the customer, Marketing Science 12 (1) (1993) 1–27. [CrossRef] [ISI]
- 122. N. Fain, N. Moes and J. Duhovnik , The role of the user and the society in new product development, Strojniški vestnik-Journal of Mechanical Engineering 56 (7–8) (2010) 513–522. [ISI]
123. W. M. Vagias, Likert-type scale response anchors, Clemson
International Institute for Tourism & Research Development,
Department of Parks, Recreation and Tourism Management. Clemson
University (2006).- 124. J. F. Perry, The
impact of supply chain management business processes on competitive
advantage and organizational performance, Doctoral dissertation, Air
Force Institute of Technology (2012). - 125. J. F. Hair, R. E. Anderson, R. L. Tatham and W. C. Black , Multivariate Data Analysis, 5th edn. (Prentice Hall International, NY, 1998).
126. B. M. Byrne , Structural equation modeling with AMOS, EQS, and
LISREL: Comparative approaches to testing for the factorial validity of a
measuring instrument, International Journal of Testing 1 (1) (2001) 55–86. [CrossRef]- 127. K. G. Jöreskog and D. Sörbom , LISREL 7: A Guide to the Program and Applications (SPSS, 1989).
128. J. C. Anderson and D. W. Gerbing , Structural equation
modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach, Psychological Bulletin 103 (3) (1988) 411. [CrossRef] [ISI]- 129. L. A. Aroian , The probability function of the product of two normally distributed variables, The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 18 (2) (1947) 265–271. [CrossRef]
130. X. Huang, M. M. Kristal and R. G. Schroeder , The impact of
organizational structure on mass customization capability: A contingency
view, Production and Operations Management 19 (5) (2010) 515–530. [CrossRef] [ISI]
131. N. J. Foss, J. Lyngsie and S. A. Zahra , Organizational
design correlates of entrepreneurship: The roles of decentralization and
formalization for opportunity discovery and realization, Strategic Organization (2014), doi:
[10.1177/1476127014561944]
. [ISI]
132. M. G. Jacobides , The inherent limits of organizational
structure and the unfulfilled role of hierarchy: Lessons from a
near-war, Organization Science 18 (3) (2007) 455–477. [CrossRef] [ISI]- 133. J. R. Galbraith , Designing Complex Organizations (Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc, 1973).
134. A. K. Gupta, S. P. Raj and D. Wilemon , A model for studying
R&D. Marketing interface in the product innovation process, The Journal of Marketing 50 (2) (1986) 7–17. [CrossRef] [ISI]
Supply Chain Management Practices and Product Development: A Moderated Mediation Model of Supply Chain Responsiveness, Organization Structure, and Research and Development | Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Systems , Vol 16, No 01 | World Scientific
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)