Search This Blog

Saturday, 11 February 2017

Supply Chain Management Practices and Product Development: A Moderated Mediation Model of Supply Chain Responsiveness, Organization Structure, and Research and Development | Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Systems , Vol 16, No 01 | World Scientific

 Source: http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/ref/10.1142/S0219686717500032



Supply Chain
Management Practices and Product Development: A Moderated Mediation
Model of Supply Chain Responsiveness, Organization Structure, and
Research and Development

References:

  • 1. G. W. Fuller , New Food Product Development: From Concept to Marketplace (CRC Press, 2016).
  • 2. B. J. Zirger and M. A. Maidique , A model of new product development: An empirical test, Management Science 36 (7) (1990) 867–883. [CrossRef] [ISI]

  • 3. I. I. Perry and F. John, The impact of supply chain business
    processes on competitive advantage and organizational performance, No.
    AFIT/LSCM/ENS/12-14, Air Force Inst of Tech Wright-Patterson AFB OH
    School Of Engineering And Management (2012).
  • 4. N. A. Ebrahim , Virtual R&D teams: A new model for product development, International Journal of Innovation 3 (2) (2015) 1. [CrossRef] [ISI]

  • 5. S. Li, B. Ragu-Nathan, T. S. Ragu-Nathan and S. S. Rao , The
    impact of supply chain management practices on competitive advantage and
    organizational performance, Omega 34 (2) (2006) 107–124. [CrossRef] [ISI]

  • 6. S. C. Lenny Koh, M. Demirbag, E. Bayraktar, E. Tatoglu and S.
    Zaim , The impact of supply chain management practices on performance
    of SMEs, Industrial Management and Data Systems 107 (1) (2007) 103–124. [CrossRef] [ISI]
  • 7. T. Schoenherr and M. Swink , The roles of supply chain intelligence and adaptability in new product launch success, Decision Sciences 46 (5) (2015) 901–936. [CrossRef] [ISI]

  • 8. M. Morita, J. A. Machuca, E. J. Flynn and J. L. P. de los Ríos
    , Aligning product characteristics and the supply chain process — A
    normative perspective, International Journal of Production Economics 161 (2015) 228–241. [CrossRef] [ISI]
  • 9. E. Mazzola, M. Bruccoleri and G. Perrone , Supply chain of innovation and new product development, Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management 21 (4) (2015) 273–284. [CrossRef] [ISI]

  • 10. R. Aydin, C. K. Kwong and P. Ji , Coordination of the
    closed-loop supply chain for product line design with consideration of
    remanufactured products, Journal of Cleaner Production 114 (2016) 286–298. [CrossRef] [ISI]

  • 11. G. L. Ragatz, R. B. Handfield and K. J. Petersen , Benefits
    associated with supplier integration into new product development under
    conditions of technology uncertainty, Journal of Business Research 55 (5) (2002) 389–400. [CrossRef] [ISI]
  • 12. A. Walter , Relationship-specific factors influencing supplier involvement in customer new product development, Journal of Business Research 56 (9) (2003) 721–733. [CrossRef] [ISI]

  • 13. D. Luzzini, M. Amann, F. Caniato, M. Essig and S. Ronchi ,
    The path of innovation: Purchasing and supplier involvement into new
    product development, Industrial Marketing Management 47 (2015) 109–120. [CrossRef] [ISI]

  • 14. K. D. Wowak, C. W. Craighead, D. J. Ketchen and G. T. M. Hult ,
    Toward a “theoretical toolbox” for the supplier-enabled fuzzy front
    end of the new product development process, Journal of Supply Chain Management 52 (1) (2016) 66–81. [CrossRef] [ISI]
  • 15. K. Brockhoff , Customers’ perspectives of involvement in new product development, International Journal of Technology Management 26 (5–6) (2003) 464–481. [CrossRef] [ISI]

  • 16. M. Sigala , Social networks and customer involvement in new
    service development (NSD) The case of www. mystarbucksidea.Com, International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management 24 (7) (2012) 966–990. [CrossRef] [ISI]
  • 17. R. Filieri , Consumer co-creation and new product development: A case study in the food industry, Marketing Intelligence and Planning 31 (1) (2013) 40–53. [CrossRef]

  • 18. A. S. Cui and F. Wu , The impact of customer involvement on new
    product development: Contingent and substitutive effects, Journal of Product Innovation Management 34 (1) (2016) 60–80. [CrossRef] [ISI]

  • 19. B. Menguc, S. Auh and P. Yannopoulos , Customer and supplier
    involvement in design: The moderating role of incremental and radical
    innovation capability, Journal of Product Innovation Management 31 (2) (2014) 313–328. [CrossRef] [ISI]
  • 20. S. Min and J. T. Mentzer , Developing and measuring supply chain management concepts, Journal of Business Logistics 25 (1) (2004) 63–99. [CrossRef]

  • 21. S. T. Cavusgil and E. Cavusgil , Reflections on international
    marketing: Destructive regeneration and multinational firms, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 40 (2) (2012) 202–217. [CrossRef] [ISI]

  • 22. S. Perçin and H. Min , A hybrid quality function deployment and
    fuzzy decision-making methodology for the optimal selection of
    third-party logistics service providers, International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications 16 (5) (2013) 380–397. [CrossRef]

  • 23. W. Yu, M. A. Jacobs, W. D. Salisbury and H. Enns , The
    effects of supply chain integration on customer satisfaction and
    financial performance: An organizational learning perspective, International Journal of Production Economics 146 (1) (2013) 346–358. [CrossRef] [ISI]

  • 24. T. A. Chin and H. H. Tat , Does gender diversity moderate the
    relationship between supply chain management practice and performance in
    the electronic manufacturing services industry? International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications 18 (1) (2015) 35–45. [CrossRef]

  • 25. A. Paulraj, I. J. Chen and C. Blome , Motives and performance
    outcomes of sustainable supply chain management practices: A
    multi-theoretical perspective, Journal of Business Ethics (2015) 1–20, doi:
    [10.1007/s10551-015-2857-0]
    .
  • 26. D. A. Marshall , Assessing the value of supply chain information sharing in the new millennium, International Journal of Supply Chain Management 4 (4) (2015) 10–21.

  • 27. S. Qrunfleh and M. Tarafdar , Supply chain management
    practices–IT utilisation alignment: Impact on supply chain performance
    and firm performance, International Journal of Business Information Systems 18 (4) (2015) 364–389. [CrossRef]
  • 28. S. C. Graves and T. Schoenmeyr , Strategic safety-stock placement in supply chains with capacity constraints, Manufacturing and Service Operations Management 18 (3) (2016) 445–460. [CrossRef] [ISI]
  • 29. F. Firouzi, M. Y. Jaber and E. Baglieri , Trust in supply forecast information sharing, International Journal of Production Research 54 (5) (2016) 1322–1333. [CrossRef] [ISI]

  • 30. Y. Shi, A. Zhang, T. Arthanari and Y. Liu , Third-party
    purchase: An empirical study of Chinese third-party logistics users, International Journal of Operations and Production Management 36 (3) (2016) 286–307. [CrossRef] [ISI]

  • 31. M. M. Wilhelm, C. Blome, V. Bhakoo and A. Paulraj ,
    Sustainability in multi-tier supply chains: Understanding the double
    agency role of the first-tier supplier, Journal of Operations Management 41 (2016) 42–60. [CrossRef] [ISI]

  • 32. E. Tatoglu, E. Bayraktar, I. Golgeci, S. L. Koh, M. Demirbag
    and S. Zaim , How do supply chain management and information systems
    practices influence operational performance? Evidence from emerging
    country SMEs, International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications 19 (3) (2016) 181–199. [CrossRef]
  • 33. S. Emmett and B. Crocker , The Relationship-Driven Supply Chain: Creating a Culture of Collaboration Throughout the Chain (CRC Press, 2016).

  • 34. H. Moradlou and C. J. Backhouse , A review of manufacturing
    re-shoring in the context of customer-focused postponement strategies, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture (2016), doi:
    [10.1177/0954405415623486]
    .
  • 35. S. Brockhaus, S.
    Fawcett, W. Kersten and M. Knemeyer , A framework for benchmarking
    product sustainability efforts: Using systems dynamics to achieve supply
    chain alignment, Benchmarking: An International Journal 23 (1) (2016) 127–164. [CrossRef]

  • 36. K. R. Lou and L. Wang , Nash and integrated solutions in a
    just-in-time seller–buyer supply chain with buyer’s ordering cost
    reductions, International Journal of Systems Science 47 (7) (2016) 1615–1623. [CrossRef] [ISI]
  • 37. M. Eskandarian, G. Marthandan, C. A. Malarvizhi and S. Z. Tehrani , Quality in e-procurement success, International Journal of Management and Information Systems 20 (3) (2016) 73.

  • 38. B. K. Brockman and R. M. Morgan , The moderating effect of
    organizational cohesiveness in knowledge use and new product
    development, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 34 (3) (2006) 295–307. [CrossRef] [ISI]

  • 39. J. Mu and C. A. Di Benedetto , Strategic orientations and new
    product commercialization: Mediator, moderator, and interplay, R&D Management 41 (4) (2011) 337–359. [CrossRef] [ISI]

  • 40. B. D. Williams, J. Roh, T. Tokar and M. Swink , Leveraging
    supply chain visibility for responsiveness: The moderating role of
    internal integration, Journal of Operations Management 31 (7) (2013) 543–554. [CrossRef] [ISI]

  • 41. M. Kim, N. C. Suresh and C. Kocabasoglu-Hillmer , An impact of
    manufacturing flexibility and technological dimensions of manufacturing
    strategy on improving supply chain responsiveness: Business environment
    perspective, International Journal of Production Research 51 (18) (2013) 5597–5611. [CrossRef] [ISI]
  • 42. S. H. Hum and M. Parlar , Measurement and optimization of supply chain responsiveness, IIE Transactions 46 (1) (2014) 1–22. [CrossRef] [ISI]

  • 43. M. Jahre and N. Fabbe-Costes , How standards and modularity can
    improve humanitarian supply chain responsiveness: The case of emergency
    response units, Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management 5 (3) (2015) 348–386. [CrossRef]

  • 44. E. Sandberg , Restructuring the supply chain to meet customer
    demands — The supply chain responsiveness of a Swedish wholesaler, The 20th Annual International Symposium on Logistics (ISL), Bologna, Italy (2015), pp. 36–37.

  • 45. J. Moyano-Fuentes, M. Sacristán-Díaz and P. Garrido-Vega ,
    Improving supply chain responsiveness through Advanced Manufacturing
    Technology: The mediating role of internal and external integration, Production Planning and Control 27 (2016) 686–697. [CrossRef] [ISI]

  • 46. A. A. Thatte, S. S. Rao and T. S. Ragu-Nathan , Impact of SCM
    practices of a firm on supply chain responsiveness and competitive
    advantage of a firm, Journal of Applied Business Research 29 (2) (2013) 499–530. [CrossRef]

  • 47. S. Qrunfleh and M. Tarafdar , Lean and agile supply chain
    strategies and supply chain responsiveness: The role of strategic
    supplier partnership and postponement, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 18 (6) (2013) 571–582. [CrossRef] [ISI]
  • 48. S. L. Brown and K. M. Eisenhardt , Product development: Past research, present findings, and future directions, Academy of Management Review 20 (2) (1995) 343–378. [ISI]

  • 49. T. Morgan, S. Anokhin, A. Kretinin and J. Frishammar , The
    dark side of the entrepreneurial orientation and market orientation
    interplay: A new product development perspective, International Small Business Journal 33 (7) (2015) 731–751. [CrossRef] [ISI]

  • 50. A. De Massis, J. Kotlar, F. Frattini, J. J. Chrisman and M.
    Nordqvist , Family governance at work organizing for new product
    development in family SMEs, Family Business Review (2016), doi:
    [10.1177/0894486515622722]
    . [CrossRef] [ISI]

  • 51. R. B. Handfield and C. Bechtel , The role of trust and
    relationship structure in improving supply chain responsiveness, Industrial Marketing Management 31 (4) (2002) 367–382. [CrossRef] [ISI]

  • 52. P. Danese, P. Romano and M. Formentini , The impact of supply
    chain integration on responsiveness: The moderating effect of using an
    international supplier network, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 49 (1) (2013) 125–140. [CrossRef] [ISI]

  • 53. E. Cantor, D. , J. Blackhurst, M. Pan and M. Crum ,
    Examining the role of stakeholder pressure and knowledge management on
    supply chain risk and demand responsiveness, The International Journal of Logistics Management 25 (1) (2014) 202–223. [CrossRef] [ISI]

  • 54. Z. Cai, Q. Huang, H. Liu and L. Liang , The moderating role
    of information technology capability in the relationship between supply
    chain collaboration and organizational responsiveness: Evidence from
    China, International Journal of Operations and Production Management 36 (10) (2016) 1247–1271. [CrossRef] [ISI]

  • 55. Q. Zhu and J. Sarkis , Relationships between operational
    practices and performance among early adopters of green supply chain
    management practices in Chinese manufacturing enterprises, Journal of Operations Management 22 (3) (2004) 265–289. [CrossRef] [ISI]

  • 56. A. Oke, D. I. Prajogo and J. Jayaram , Strengthening the
    innovation chain: The role of internal innovation climate and strategic
    relationships with supply chain partners, Journal of Supply Chain Management 49 (4) (2013) 43–58. [CrossRef] [ISI]
  • 57. Z. Liu, D. Prajogo and A. Oke , Supply chain technologies: Linking adoption, utilization, and performance, Journal of Supply Chain Management 52 (4) (2016) 22–41. [CrossRef] [ISI]
  • 58. D. S. Pugh, D. J. Hickson, C. R. Hinings and C. Turner , Dimensions of organization structure, Administrative Science Quarterly 1 (1968) 65–105. [CrossRef] [ISI]
  • 59. J. Child , Predicting and understanding organization structure, Administrative Science Quarterly 1 (1973) 168–185. [CrossRef] [ISI]

  • 60. L. A. Gordon and V. K. Narayanan , Management accounting
    systems, perceived environmental uncertainty and organization structure:
    An empirical investigation, Accounting, Organizations and Society 9 (1) (1984) 33–47. [CrossRef] [ISI]

  • 61. J. G. Covin and D. P. Slevin , The influence of organization
    structure on the utility of an entrepreneurial top management style, Journal of Management Studies 25 (3) (1988) 217–234. [CrossRef] [ISI]

  • 62. R. C. Levin, A. K. Klevorick, R. R. Nelson, S. G. Winter, R.
    Gilbert and Z. Griliches, Appropriating the returns from industrial
    research and development, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1987(3) (1987) 783–831.
  • 63. N. R. Jennings, K. Sycara and M. Wooldridge , A roadmap of agent research and development, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 1 (1) (1998) 7–38. [CrossRef]

  • 64. T. Elkins and R. T. Keller , Leadership in research and
    development organizations: A literature review and conceptual framework,
    The Leadership Quarterly 14 (4) (2003) 587–606. [CrossRef] [ISI]

  • 65. R. M. Baron and D. A. Kenny , The moderator–mediator variable
    distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and
    statistical considerations, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51 (6) (1986) 1173. [CrossRef] [ISI]
  • 66. D. Muller, C. M. Judd and V. Y. Yzerbyt , When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 89 (6) (2005) 852. [CrossRef] [ISI]

  • 67. J. R. Edwards and L. S. Lambert , Methods for integrating
    moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated
    path analysis, Psychological Methods 12 (1) (2007) 1. [CrossRef] [ISI]

  • 68. K. J. Preacher, D. D. Rucker and A. F. Hayes , Addressing
    moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions, Multivariate Behavioral Research 42 (1) (2007) 185–227. [CrossRef] [ISI]

  • 69. F. G. Gilal, R. G. Gilal, J. Zhang, R. G. Gilal and N. G.
    Gilal , Supply Chain management practices as a contemporary source of
    securing competitive advantage and organizational performance: Evidence
    from the FMCGs of Pakistan, International Journal of Information Systems and Change Management 8 (3), in press.
  • 70. A. Ghosh, S. Das and A. Deshpande , Effect of responsiveness and process integration in supply chain coordination, IUP Journal of Supply Chain Management 11 (1) (2014) 7.
  • 71. G. Seebacher and H. Winkler , A capability approach to evaluate supply chain flexibility, International Journal of Production Economics 167 (2015) 177–186. [CrossRef] [ISI]

  • 72. K. Fantazy and M. Salem , The value of strategy and flexibility
    in new product development: The impact on performance, Journal of Enterprise Information Management 29 (4) (2016) 525–548. [CrossRef] [ISI]

  • 73. S. Tyagi, A. Choudhary, X. Cai and K. Yang , Value stream
    mapping to reduce the lead-time of a product development process, International Journal of Production Economics 160 (2015) 202–212. [CrossRef] [ISI]
  • 74. R. G. Cooper , Predevelopment activities determine new product success, Industrial Marketing Management 17 (3) (1988) 237–247. [CrossRef] [ISI]
  • 75. W. Chang and S. A. Taylor , The effectiveness of customer participation in new product development: A meta-analysis, Journal of Marketing 80 (1) (2016) 47–64. [CrossRef] [ISI]
  • 76. K. Talke and E. J. Hultink , Managing diffusion barriers when launching new products, Journal of Product Innovation Management 27 (4) (2010) 537–553. [CrossRef] [ISI]
  • 77. S. H. Kim and S. Netessine , Collaborative cost reduction and component procurement under information asymmetry, Management Science 59 (1) (2013) 189–206. [CrossRef] [ISI]

  • 78. R. Eltantawy, A. Paulraj, L. Giunipero, D. Naslund and A. A.
    Thute , Towards supply chain coordination and productivity in a three
    echelon supply chain: Action research study, International Journal of Operations and Production Management 35 (6) (2015) 895–924. [CrossRef] [ISI]
  • 79. S. B. Aissa and M. Goaied , Determinants of Tunisian hotel profitability: The role of managerial efficiency, Tourism Management 52 (2016) 478–487. [CrossRef] [ISI]

  • 80. E. Bayraktar, M. Demirbag, S. L. Koh, E. Tatoglu and H. Zaim ,
    A causal analysis of the impact of information systems and supply
    chain management practices on operational performance: Evidence from
    manufacturing SMEs in Turkey, International Journal of Production Economics 122 (1) (2009) 133–149. [CrossRef] [ISI]

  • 81. E. Bayraktar, A. Gunasekaran, S. L. Koh, E. Tatoglu, M.
    Demirbag and S. Zaim , An efficiency comparison of supply chain
    management and information systems practices: A study of Turkish and
    Bulgarian small-and medium-sized enterprises in food products and
    beverages, International Journal of Production Research 48 (2) (2010) 425–451. [CrossRef] [ISI]

  • 82. S. M. Ebrahimi, Examining the impact of supply chain integration
    on organization structure and operational performance in oil and gas
    supply chains: A contingency approach, Doctoral dissertation, University
    of Sheffield (2015).
  • 83. J. D. Thompson , Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory (Transaction Publishers, 1967).

  • 84. D. R. Dalton, W. D. Todor, M. J. Spendolini, G. J. Fielding
    and L. W. Porter , Organization structure and performance: A critical
    review, Academy of Management Review 5 (1) (1980) 49–64.

  • 85. N. Erhardt, C. Martin-Rios and J. Harkins , Knowledge flow
    from the top: The importance of teamwork structure in team sports, European Sport Management Quarterly 14 (4) (2014) 375–396. [CrossRef] [ISI]

  • 86. R. Germain, C. Claycomb and C. Dröge , Supply chain
    variability, organizational structure, and performance: The moderating
    effect of demand unpredictability, Journal of Operations Management 26 (5) (2008) 557–570. [CrossRef] [ISI]

  • 87. Q. Yinan, M. Tang and M. Zhang , Mass customization in flat
    organization: The mediating role of supply chain planning and
    corporation coordination, Journal of Applied Research and Technology 12 (2) (2014) 171–181. [CrossRef]

  • 88. X. A. Koufteros and M. A. Vonderembse , The impact of
    organizational structure on the level of JIT attainment: Towards theory
    development, International Journal of Production Research 36 (10) (1998) 2863–2878. [CrossRef] [ISI]

  • 89. A. Y. Nahm, M. A. Vonderembse and X. A. Koufteros , The impact
    of organizational structure on time-based manufacturing and plant
    performance, Journal of Operations Management 21 (3) (2003) 281–306. [CrossRef] [ISI]
  • 90. F. C. Lunenburg , Organizational structure: Mintzberg’s framework, International Journal of Scholarly, Academic, Intellectual Diversity 14 (1) (2012) 1–8.

  • 91. D. Baumann-Pauly, C. Wickert, L. J. Spence and A. G. Scherer ,
    Organizing corporate social responsibility in small and large firms:
    Size matters, Journal of Business Ethics 115 (4) (2013) 693–705. [CrossRef] [ISI]
  • 92. R. W. Griffin , Fundamentals of Management (Cengage Learning, 2013).
  • 93. A. M. Townsend, S. M. DeMarie and A. R. Hendrickson , Virtual teams: Technology and the workplace of the future, The Academy of Management Executive 12 (3) (1998) 17–29.
  • 94. P. K. Humphreys, M. K. Lai and D. Sculli , An inter-organizational information system for supply chain management, International Journal of Production Economics 70 (3) (2001) 245–255. [CrossRef] [ISI]

  • 95. A. Paulraj, A. A. Lado and I. J. Chen , Inter-organizational
    communication as a relational competency: Antecedents and performance
    outcomes in collaborative buyer–supplier relationships, Journal of Operations Management 26 (1) (2008) 45–64. [CrossRef] [ISI]

  • 96. S. Gold, S. Seuring and P. Beske , Sustainable supply chain
    management and inter-organizational resources: A literature review, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 17 (4) (2010) 230–245. [ISI]

  • 97. R. Rajaguru and M. J. Matanda , Effects of inter-organizational
    compatibility on supply chain capabilities: Exploring the mediating
    role of inter-organizational information systems (IOIS) integration, Industrial Marketing Management 42 (4) (2013) 620–632. [CrossRef] [ISI]

  • 98. J. M. Denolf, J. H. Trienekens, P. N. Wognum, J. G. van der
    Vorst and S. O. Omta , Towards a framework of critical success factors
    for implementing supply chain information systems, Computers in Industry 68 (2015) 16–26. [CrossRef] [ISI]

  • 99. X. Zhang, D. P. Van Donk and T. van der Vaart , The different
    impact of inter-organizational and intra-organizational ICT on suppy
    chain performance, International Journal of Operations and Production Management 36 (7) (2016) 803–824. [CrossRef] [ISI]
  • 100. P. Arlow and M. J. Gannon , Social responsiveness, corporate structure, and economic performance, Academy of Management Review 7 (2) (1982) 235–241.

  • 101. M. Perez-Valls, J. Cespedes-Lorente and J. Moreno-Garcia ,
    Green practices and organizational design as sources of strategic
    flexibility and performance, Business Strategy and the Environment (2015), doi:
    [10.1002/bse.1881]
    .
  • 102. J. Y. Lee, I. V.
    Kozlenkova and R. W. Palmatier , Structural marketing: Using
    organizational structure to achieve marketing objectives, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 43 (1) (2015) 73–99. [CrossRef] [ISI]
  • 103. E. A. Hoşgör , Organizational structure, Wiley Encyclopedia of Management 6 (2015) 1–6. [CrossRef]

  • 104. J. Joseph, R. Klingebiel and A. J. Wilson , Organizational
    structure and performance feedback: Centralization, aspirations, and
    termination decisions, Organization Science 27 (5) (2016) 1065–1083. [CrossRef] [ISI]
  • 105. I. Garbie , Management for sustainability, in Sustainability in Manufacturing Enterprise (Springer International Publishing, 2016), pp. 81–89. [CrossRef]

  • 106. M. Holweg, S. Disney, J. Holmström and J. Småros , Supply
    chain collaboration: Making sense of the strategy continuum, European Management Journal 23 (2) (2005) 170–181. [CrossRef]
  • 107. R. R. Lummus, L. K. Duclos and R. J. Vokurka , Supply chain flexibility: Building a new model, Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management 4 (4) (2003) 1–13.

  • 108. C. Liu, B. Huo, S. Liu and X. Zhao , Effect of information
    sharing and process coordination on logistics outsourcing, Industrial Management and Data Systems 115 (1) (2015) 41–63. [CrossRef] [ISI]

  • 109. J. G. van der Vorst, R. Ossevoort, M. de Keizer, T. van
    Woensel, C. N. Verdouw, E. Wenink and R. van Willegen , DAVINC3I:
    Towards collaborative responsive logistics networks in floriculture, in
    Logistics and Supply Chain Innovation (Springer International Publishing, 2016), pp. 37–53. [CrossRef]

  • 110. M. M. P. Marchesini and R. L. C. Alcântara , Logistics
    activities in supply chain business process: A conceptual framework to
    guide their implementation, The International Journal of Logistics Management 27 (1) (2016) 6–30. [CrossRef] [ISI]

  • 111. T. Yan, T. Y. Choi, Y. Kim and Y. Yang , A theory of the
    nexus supplier: A critical supplier from a network perspective, Journal of Supply Chain Management 51 (1) (2015) 52–66. [CrossRef] [ISI]

  • 112. P. Y. Chu, K. H. Chang and H. F. Huang , How to increase
    supplier flexibility through social mechanisms and influence strategies?
    Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing 27 (2) (2012) 115–131. [CrossRef] [ISI]
  • 113. L. E. Gadde, H. Håkansson and G. Persson , Supply Network Strategies (John Wiley and Sons, 2010).

  • 114. A. A. Thatte, V. Agrawal and S. Muhammed , Linking
    information sharing and supplier network responsiveness with delivery
    dependability of a firm, Journal of Applied Business Research 25 (3) (2011) 37–56.

  • 115. Y. Kuo, T. Yang, D. Parker and C. H. Sung , Integration of
    customer and supplier flexibility in a make-to-order industry, Industrial Management and Data Systems 116 (2) (2016) 213–235. [CrossRef] [ISI]

  • 116. F. M. Armbrecht Jr , Industrial research institute’s 3rd annual
    R&D leader board: R&D Spending by the Top 100 US technology
    investors in 2000, Research-Technology Management 45 (1) (2002) 21.

  • 117. D. M. Kim and G. D. Lee , Introduction to the technology,
    applications, products, markets, R&D, and perspectives of nanofoods
    in the food industry, Nanotechnology 25 (2006) 32–38.

  • 118. M. Song and R. J. Thieme , A cross-national investigation of
    the R&D–marketing interface in the product innovation process, Industrial Marketing Management 35 (3) (2006) 308–322. [CrossRef] [ISI]
  • 119. M. A. Schilling and C. W. Hill , Managing the new product development process: Strategic imperatives, The Academy of Management Executive 12 (3) (1998) 67–81.
  • 120. L. Aarikka-Stenroos and B. Sandberg , From new-product development to commercialization through networks, Journal of Business Research 65 (2) (2012) 198–206. [CrossRef] [ISI]
  • 121. A. Griffin and J. R. Hauser , The voice of the customer, Marketing Science 12 (1) (1993) 1–27. [CrossRef] [ISI]
  • 122. N. Fain, N. Moes and J. Duhovnik , The role of the user and the society in new product development, Strojniški vestnik-Journal of Mechanical Engineering 56 (7–8) (2010) 513–522. [ISI]

  • 123. W. M. Vagias, Likert-type scale response anchors, Clemson
    International Institute for Tourism & Research Development,
    Department of Parks, Recreation and Tourism Management. Clemson
    University (2006).
  • 124. J. F. Perry, The
    impact of supply chain management business processes on competitive
    advantage and organizational performance, Doctoral dissertation, Air
    Force Institute of Technology (2012).
  • 125. J. F. Hair, R. E. Anderson, R. L. Tatham and W. C. Black , Multivariate Data Analysis, 5th edn. (Prentice Hall International, NY, 1998).

  • 126. B. M. Byrne , Structural equation modeling with AMOS, EQS, and
    LISREL: Comparative approaches to testing for the factorial validity of a
    measuring instrument, International Journal of Testing 1 (1) (2001) 55–86. [CrossRef]
  • 127. K. G. Jöreskog and D. Sörbom , LISREL 7: A Guide to the Program and Applications (SPSS, 1989).

  • 128. J. C. Anderson and D. W. Gerbing , Structural equation
    modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach, Psychological Bulletin 103 (3) (1988) 411. [CrossRef] [ISI]
  • 129. L. A. Aroian , The probability function of the product of two normally distributed variables, The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 18 (2) (1947) 265–271. [CrossRef]

  • 130. X. Huang, M. M. Kristal and R. G. Schroeder , The impact of
    organizational structure on mass customization capability: A contingency
    view, Production and Operations Management 19 (5) (2010) 515–530. [CrossRef] [ISI]

  • 131. N. J. Foss, J. Lyngsie and S. A. Zahra , Organizational
    design correlates of entrepreneurship: The roles of decentralization and
    formalization for opportunity discovery and realization, Strategic Organization (2014), doi:
    [10.1177/1476127014561944]
    . [ISI]

  • 132. M. G. Jacobides , The inherent limits of organizational
    structure and the unfulfilled role of hierarchy: Lessons from a
    near-war, Organization Science 18 (3) (2007) 455–477. [CrossRef] [ISI]
  • 133. J. R. Galbraith , Designing Complex Organizations (Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc, 1973).

  • 134. A. K. Gupta, S. P. Raj and D. Wilemon , A model for studying
    R&D. Marketing interface in the product innovation process, The Journal of Marketing 50 (2) (1986) 7–17. [CrossRef] [ISI]


Supply Chain Management Practices and Product Development: A Moderated Mediation Model of Supply Chain Responsiveness, Organization Structure, and Research and Development | Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Systems , Vol 16, No 01 | World Scientific

No comments:

Post a comment