Does Criticisms Overcome the Praises of Journal Impact Factor? - Munich Personal RePEc Archive

Does Criticisms Overcome the Praises of Journal Impact Factor?

Fooladi, Masood and Salehi, Hadi and Md Yunus , Melor and Farhadi, Maryam and Aghaei Chadegani, Arezoo and Farhadi, Hadi and Ale Ebrahim, Nader (2013): Does Criticisms Overcome the Praises of Journal Impact Factor? Published in: Asian Social Science , Vol. 9, No. 5 (27. April 2013): pp. 176-182.

PDF MPRA_paper_46899.pdf Download (357Kb) | Preview

Abstract

Journal impact factor (IF) as a gauge of influence and impact of a particular journal comparing with other journals in the same area of research, reports the mean number of citations to the published articles in particular journal. Although, IF attracts more attention and being used more frequently than other measures, it has been subjected to criticisms, which overcome the advantages of IF. Critically, extensive use of IF may result in destroying editorial and researchers’ behaviour, which could compromise the quality of scientific articles. Therefore, it is the time of the timeliness and importance of a new invention of journal ranking techniques beyond the journal impact factor.

Item Type:	MPRA Paper
Original Title:	Does Criticisms Overcome the Praises of Journal Impact Factor?
English Title:	Does Criticisms Overcome the Praises of Journal Impact Factor?
Language:	English
Keywords:	Impact factor (IF), Journal ranking, Criticism, Praise, SCOPUS, Web of science, Self-citation
Subjects:	I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I0 - General I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Insititutions I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Insititutions > I21 - Analysis of Education I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Insititutions > I25 - Education and Economic Development I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Insititutions > I29 - Other O - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development O - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O10 - General P - Economic Systems > P0 - General P - Economic Systems > P0 - General > P00 - General Z - Other Special Topics > Z0 - General > Z00 - General Z - Other Special Topics > Z1 - Cultural Economics; Economic Sociology; Economic Anthropology > Z13 - Economic Sociology; Economic Anthropology; Social and Economic Stratification
Item ID:	46899
Depositing User:	Nader Ale Ebrahim
Date Deposited:	11. May 2013 07:46
Last Modified:	11. May 2013 07:57
References:	Andersen, J., Belmont, J., & Cho, C. T. (2006). Journal impact factor in the era of expanding literature, Journal of Microbiology, Immunology and Infection, 39, 436-443. Arnold, D. N., & Fowler, K. K. (2011). Nefarious numbers. Notices of the American Mathematical Society, 58(3), 434-437. Baum, J. A. C. (2011). Free-riding on power laws: Questioning the validity of the impact factor as a measure of research quality in organization studies. Organization, 18(4), 449-466. Bergstrom, C. (2007). Eigenfactor: Measuring the value and prestige of scholarly journals, College & Research Libraries News, 68(5), 314-316. Bollen, J., Rodriguez, M. A., & Sompel, H. (2006). Journal status, Scientometrics, 69(3), 669-687. Dong, P., Loh, M., & Mondry, A. (2005). The impact factor revisited, Biomedical Digital Libraries, 2. European Association of Science Editors (EASE). (2010). Statement on inappropriate use of impact factors. Retrieved from http://www.ease.org.uk/publications/impact-factor-statement Falagas, M. E., & Alexiou, V. G. (2007). Editors may inappropriately influence authors’ decisions regarding selection of references in scientific articles. International Journal of Impotence Research, 19, 443-445 Falagas, M. E., & Kavvadia, P. (2006). Eigenlob: Self-citation in biomedical journals. Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology Journal, 20, 1039-1042 Falagas, M. E., Kouranos, V. D., Arencibia-Jorge, R., & Karageorgopoulos, D. E. (2008). Comparison of SCImago journal rank indicator with journal impact factor. The Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology Journal, 22(8), 2623-2628. Fassoulaki, A., Papilas, K., Paraskeva, A., & Patris, K. (2002). Impact factor bias and proposed adjustments for its determination. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 46, 902-905. Garfield, E. (1996). How can impact factors be improved? British Medical Journal, 313, 411-413. Garfield, E. (1998). Der impact faktor und seine richtige anwendung. Der Unfallchirurg, 101(6), 413-414. Garner, R., Lunin, L., & Baker, L. (1967). Three Drexel information science research studies. Madison: Drexel Press. Giles, C. L., Bollacker, K. D., & Lawrence, S. (1998). An automatic citation indexing system, Digital Libraries 98- Third ACM Conference on Digital Libraries, New York, 89-98. Greenwood, D. C. (2007). Reliability of journal impact factor rankings. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 7(48), 1-6. Hemmingsson, A., Mygind, T., Skjennald, A., & Edgren, J. (2002). Manipulation of impact factors by editors of scientific journals. American Journal of Roentgenology, 178(3), 767-767. Joint Committee on Quantitative Assessment of Research. (2008, June 12). Citation Statistics, 1-26. Khan, & Hegde, (2009). Is impact factor true evaluation for ranking quality measure? Journal of Library & Information Technology, 29(3), 55-58.
URI:	http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/46899

All papers reproduced by permission. Reproduction and distribution subject to the approval of the copyright owners.

Does Criticisms Overcome the Praises of Journal Impact Factor? - Munich Personal RePEc Archive