Search This Blog

Loading...

Saturday, 14 September 2013

A framework for SaaS software packages evaluation and selection with virtual team and BOCR of analytic network process - Online First - Springer


A framework for SaaS software packages evaluation and selection with virtual team and BOCR of analytic network process

 References:
  1. Benlian A, Hess T (2011) Opportunities and risks of software-as-a-service: findings from a survey of IT executives. Decis Support Syst 52:232–246 CrossRef
  2. Camarinha-matos LM, Afsarmanesh H (2003) Elements of a base VE infrastructure. Comput Ind 51:139–163 CrossRef
  3. Challa JS, Paul A, Dada Y, Nerella V, Srivastava PR, Singh AP (2011) Integrated software quality evaluation: a fuzzy multi-criteria approach. Int J Inf Process Syst 7(3):473–518
  4. Cochran JK, Chen H (2005) Fuzzy multi-criteria selection of object-oriented simulation software for production system analysis. Comput Oper Res 32:153–168 CrossRef
  5. Colombo E, Francalanci C (2004) Selecting CRM packages based on architectural, functional, and cost requirements: empirical validation of a hierarchical ranking model. Requir Eng 9:186–203 CrossRef
  6. Davis L, Williams G (1994) Evaluation and selecting simulation software using the analytic hierarchy process. Integr Manuf Syst 5(1):23–32 CrossRef
  7. Ebrahim NA, Ahmed S, Taha Z (2009) Virtual teams: a literature review. Aust J Basic Appl Sci 3(3):2653–2669
  8. Fan M, Kumar S, Whinston AB (2009) Short-term and long-term competition between providers of shrink-wrap software and software as a service. Eur J Oper Res 196:661–671 CrossRef
  9. Ergu D, Kou G, Peng Y, Shi Y (2011) A simple method to improve the consistency ratio of the pair-wise comparison matrix in ANP. Eur J Oper Res 213(1):246–259 CrossRef
  10. Franch X, Carvallo JP (2003) Using quality models in software package selection. IEEE Softw 20(1):34–41 CrossRef
  11. Garg SK, Versteeg S, Buyya R (2012) A framework for ranking of cloud computing services. Future Gener Comput Syst. doi:10.1016/j.future.2012.06.006
  12. Jadhav AS, Sonar RM (2009) Evaluating and selecting software packages: a review. Inf Softw Technol 51:555–563 CrossRef
  13. Jadhav AS, Sonar RM (2011) Framework for evaluation and selection of the software packages: a hybrid knowledge based system approach. The journal of Systems and Software
  14. Kannan G, Vinay VP (2008) Multi-criteria decision making for the selection of CAD/CAM system. Int J Interact Des Manuf 2(3):151–159 CrossRef
  15. Lai VS, Trueblood RP, Wong BK (1999) Software selection: a case study of the application of the analytical hierarchical process to the selection of a multimedia authoring system. Inf Manag 36:221–232 CrossRef
  16. Lipnack J, Stamps J (2000) Why the way to work. virtual teams: people working across boundaries with technology, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York
  17. Kou G, Lu Y, Peng Y, Shi Y (2012) Evaluation of classification algorithms using MCDM and rank correlation. Int J Inf Technol & Decis Mak 11(1):197–225 CrossRef
  18. Meade LM, Presley A (2002) R&D project selection using the analytic network process (ANP). IEEE Trans Eng Manag 49(1):59–66 CrossRef
  19. Morisio M, Tsoukias A (1997) IusWare: a methodology for the evaluation and selection of software products. IEEE Proc Softw Eng 144(3):162–174 CrossRef
  20. Park J, Jeong HY (2012) The QoS-based MCDM system for SaaS ERP applications with social network. J Supercomput. doi:10.1007/s11227-012-0832-4
  21. Peng Y, Kou G, Shi Y, Chen Z (2008) A descriptive framework for the field of data mining and knowledge discovery. Int J Inf Technol & Decis Mak 7(4):639–682 CrossRef
  22. Peng Y, Kou G, Wang G, Shi Y (2011) FAMCDM: a fusion approach of MCDM methods to rank multiclass classification algorithms. Omega 39(6):677–689 CrossRef
  23. Peng Y, Kou G, Wang G, Wu W, Shi Y (2011) Ensemble of software defect predictors: an AHP-based evaluation method. Int J Inf Technol & Decis Mak 10(1):187–206 CrossRef
  24. Piccoli G, Powell A, Ives B (2004) Virtual teams: team control structure, work processes, and team effectiveness. Inf Technol People 17:359–379 CrossRef
  25. Precup L, O’sullivan D, Cormican K, Dooley L (2006) Virtual team environment for collaborative research projects. Int J Innov Learn 3:77–94 CrossRef
  26. Saaty TL (1996) Decision making with dependence and feedback: the analytic network process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh. ISBN 0-9620317-9-8
  27. Saaty TL (2001) Decision making with the analytic network process (ANP) and its ‘Super decisions’ software: the national missile defense (NMD) example. In: ISAHP 2001 proceedings, Bern, Switzerland, pp 2–4
  28. Saaty TL (2006) The analytic network process, decision making with the analytic network process. International series in operations research & management science, vol 95. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–26
  29. Saaty TL (2009) Theory and applications of the analytic network process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh. ISBN 1888603-06-2
  30. Saaty TL, Vargus LG (2011) The encyclicon, Vol 3: A dictionary of complex decisions using the analytic network process. RWS Publication, Pittsburgh
  31. Sarkis J, Talluri S (2004) Evaluating and selecting e-commerce software and communication systems for supply chain. Eur J Oper Res 159:318–329 CrossRef
  32. Shang JS, Tjader Y, Ding Y (2004) A unified framework fro multicriteria evaluation of transportation projects. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 51(3):300–313 CrossRef

A framework for SaaS software packages evaluation and selection with virtual team and BOCR of analytic network process - Online First - Springer

No comments:

Post a Comment